Tom's Hardware got a hold of a "Kentsfield" quad-core processor qualification sample from Intel, is providing some tasty details, and they'll be putting up benchmarks tomorrow. *wipes drool off the keyboard* link
Quote:

By the end of this year, four cores will have replaced dual-core systems on the very high-end of enthusiast systems. AMD will be offering its 4x4 platform that enables the use of two dual-core processor and Intel will be first to offer a quad-core processor: Code-named "Kentsfield," the CPU was demonstrated first at this year's Spring IDF. Intel originally planned to launch the CPU in Q1 of 2007, but informed press and analysts during the Q2 earnings conference call that it will be introducing the chip for a late 2006 availability.

Details about the chip have been scarce. So far, Intel has declined to release specifications and performance data, but industry sources recently indicated that the processor will be clocked with 2.67 GHz and run on a 1066 MHz FSB. Since the CPU combines two Conroe dual-core chips, the chip will carry 2 x 4 MB L2 cache; Kentsfield will be a Conroe "drop-in" chip and work with the 965 and 975 series chipsets on today's Core 2 Duo motherboards.
...
Kentsfield, which industry sources refer to as "Core 2 Quadro," arrived as a 2.67 GHz version with a 266 MHz/1066 MHz FSB. The test engineers were able to adjust the FSB to 1333 MHz - which is still supported by the 975X chipset - and overclock the CPU by about 25%. The benchmarks were conducted with clock speeds ranging from 2.0 GHz to 3.33 GHz.

Kentsfield easily shattered previous benchmarks records and highlighted its horsepower especially in threaded applications such as audio and video processing. The chip was able to set new record levels in traditional benchmarks such as 3DMark 05 and 3DMark 06 as well. Overall, Kentsfield turned out to be about twice as fast as the Pentium EE 965, while consuming about the same power. And while power consumption is up significantly from the Core 2 Extreme, the chip still undercuts the Pentium EE 840.
The quads are coming ph43r When's AMD going to come out with a quad core proc? Very Happy
Ultimate Dev'r wrote:
The quads are coming ph43r When's AMD going to come out with a quad core proc? Very Happy


Next year (I was going to post something about it, but I decided it was not quite important enough Razz ). Hopefully early, but I think more like around Summer.

P.S. Click the link, there is some link at the bottom that leads to the AMD one
Oh, very cool. It was about time someone came up with quad-core processors for those who need quad quad-core systems. Evil or Very Mad
I think I'll wait for the octal-cores.
Or we could just go out and buy ourselves a super computer, much more effective Rolling Eyes
Personally, I think we should all dig out our Atari 2600s and use the "BASIC Programming" cartridge to make an office suite, webbrowser, and email client. It should be fun since you can't save in it Rolling Eyes
Ultimate Dev'r wrote:
The quads are coming ph43r When's AMD going to come out with a quad core proc? Very Happy


for us mac people the quads were here a long time ago :p
Harq wrote:
Or we could just go out and buy ourselves a super computer, much more effective Rolling Eyes


How so? Super computers are just hundreds (sometimes thousands) of regular ol' CPUs, so it won't be any more "effective" Laughing

@Elf: PCs have multi-CPU systems too Rolling Eyes (while you make it sound like it was a quad-core, it wasn't, so don't try and make it sound impressive when its not Razz ) hell, you could get a dual dual-core Opteron system and have it run in a desktop case on air just fine with Quad-SLI, top that mac boy Evil or Very Mad
Kllrnohj wrote:
Harq wrote:
Or we could just go out and buy ourselves a super computer, much more effective Rolling Eyes


How so? Super computers are just hundreds (sometimes thousands) of regular ol' CPUs, so it won't be any more "effective" 0x5

@Elf: PCs have multi-CPU systems too Rolling Eyes (while you make it sound like it was a quad-core, it wasn't, so don't try and make it sound impressive when its not Razz ) hell, you could get a dual dual-core Opteron system and have it run in a desktop case on air just fine with Quad-SLI, top that mac boy Evil or Very Mad

umm....the Quad-Core G5s which were, in fact, quad-cores had 4 64bit, 2.5 GHz processors.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Power_Mac_G5
Might want to actually read the link yourself Wink

Quote:
Apple refers to the dual-core PowerPC 970MP processors as either the "G5 Dual" (for single socket, dual-core configurations), or "G5 Quad" (for dual socket, four-core configurations).

and

Quote:
The Power Mac G5 line in 2006 consisted of three, dual-core PowerPC G5 configurations, operating at 2.0, 2.3, and a dual-processor 2.5 GHz configuration (the dual contains four cores in total, two per processor). A 2.7ghz single-core model was also released. The G5 processor is a common name given to several different chips manufactured by IBM: the PowerPC 970, 970FX, and 970MP, based upon IBM’s POWER4 processor.
Kllrnohj wrote:
Might want to actually read the link yourself Wink

Quote:
Apple refers to the dual-core PowerPC 970MP processors as either the "G5 Dual" (for single socket, dual-core configurations), or "G5 Quad" (for dual socket, four-core configurations).

and

Quote:
The Power Mac G5 line in 2006 consisted of three, dual-core PowerPC G5 configurations, operating at 2.0, 2.3, and a dual-processor 2.5 GHz configuration (the dual contains four cores in total, two per processor). A 2.7ghz single-core model was also released. The G5 processor is a common name given to several different chips manufactured by IBM: the PowerPC 970, 970FX, and 970MP, based upon IBM’s POWER4 processor.


still 4 cores Wink
elfprince13 wrote:
still 4 cores Wink


Psh, nothing special about just having four cores - especially since it is so freaking hot it has to be watercooled Razz
Kllrnohj wrote:
elfprince13 wrote:
still 4 cores Wink


Psh, nothing special about just having four cores - especially since it is so freaking hot it has to be watercooled Razz


a single chip with 4 cores isn't that much faster than 2 dual cores....
It isn't ANY faster, just cheaper - more accurately for the intel chips, however, it will probably be SLOWER due to a shared FSB to the RAM
but its stilll 32 bit.... :p
An update, they put up their benchmarking results earlier, so if you haven't seen it already go have a look.
elfprince13 wrote:
but its stilll 32 bit.... :p


No, the Intel's are 64bit, and they have been for awile (there are 64bit P4s) - they use the EMT64 instruction set, which is a near copy of the AMD64 instruction set

EDIT: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EMT64 - emt64 was added to the prescott cores
Give him some slack Kllrnohj - he runs a mac Razz

Quote:
but its stilll 32 bit.... :p


I think you're referring to the Clovertown procs...
Kllrnohj wrote:
elfprince13 wrote:
but its stilll 32 bit.... :p


No, the Intel's are 64bit, and they have been for awile (there are 64bit P4s) - they use the EMT64 instruction set, which is a near copy of the AMD64 instruction set

EDIT: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EMT64 - emt64 was added to the prescott cores


remember that macs use intel's now too, and I distinctly remember everyone being disappointed that they were switching back to 32bit processors....and the article said that these would be used in the intel core duo's
  
Register to Join the Conversation
Have your own thoughts to add to this or any other topic? Want to ask a question, offer a suggestion, share your own programs and projects, upload a file to the file archives, get help with calculator and computer programming, or simply chat with like-minded coders and tech and calculator enthusiasts via the site-wide AJAX SAX widget? Registration for a free Cemetech account only takes a minute.

» Go to Registration page
Page 1 of 2
» All times are UTC - 5 Hours
 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

 

Advertisement